Session two was another recap on a session from a similar time last year, but more in depth and to see if our understanding had developed. We had to identify different areas within the illustrative practice and separate each area into product, context and function. It was useful to see how (and if...) our opinions had changed, as we should know more about illustration than we did this time last year.
If we don't know what illustration is, how can we expect to be successful illustrators? We have to know where our work will exist and where what sort of jobs we will be looking at when we graduate. Context was weirdly hard to list; we realised that "context" itself is a very broad term and could be sub-divided into physical context, conceptual context, disciplinary context etc.
Product = what
Context - where
Function = why
Drawing = process
Image making = visual language
Illustration = communication
A brief = a problem we are there to solve.
Worries for when we graduate...
- Not getting work
- Being exploited/not getting paid properly
- Style/development stuck in a rut
- People stealing your work (copyright issues)
- Not enjoying the work any more
A nice quote: "Creative people answer questions with another question."









